Family Analysis Council : Arguments From Personal Science Against Same-Sex Wedding

Family Analysis Council : Arguments From Personal Science Against Same-Sex Wedding

A big and growing human anatomy of medical proof suggests that the intact, married family members is the best for children. In specific, the ongoing work of scholars David Popenoe, Linda Waite, Maggie Gallagher, Sara McLanahan, David Blankenhorn, Paul Amato, and Alan Booth has added for this summary.

This declaration from Sara McLanahan, a sociologist at Princeton University, is representative:

We would probably come up with something quite similar to the two-parent ideal if we were asked to design a system for making sure that children’s basic needs were met. This kind of design, the theory is that, will never just make sure kiddies had usage of the right money and time of two grownups, it would offer a method of checks and balances that promoted quality parenting. The truth that both moms and dads have biological link with the little one would boost the chance that the moms and dads would recognize utilizing the son or daughter and become prepared to lose for that son or daughter, and it also would lessen the chance that either moms and dad would abuse the little one.

Sara McLanahan and Gary Sandefur, Growing Up with an individual Parent: just just just What Hurts, just What Helps (Boston: Harvard University Press, 1994) 38. Continue reading “Family Analysis Council : Arguments From Personal Science Against Same-Sex Wedding”